top of page


In the annals of corporate history, few stories capture the essence of resilience and justice like that of Kenneth Nkosana Makate versus telecommunications giant Vodacom. Makate's journey, fraught with legal hurdles and corporate resistance, epitomizes the struggle of an individual against a corporate behemoth, all centred around his ground-breaking invention: the "Please Call Me" service.


The Battle Unfolds


Makate's saga began in the early 2000s when he conceived the idea for the "Please Call Me" service while working at Vodacom. What followed was a protracted legal battle as Makate sought rightful compensation for his innovation, which Vodacom had implemented without acknowledgment or payment.


Years of legal wrangling culminated in a landmark ruling by the Supreme Court of Appeal in South Africa, recognizing Makate's pivotal role in creating a service that had generated substantial revenue for Vodacom. The court's decision to award Makate a minimum of R29 billion, equivalent to 5% to 7.5% of the total voice revenue from the "Please Call Me" service, marked a significant victory for intellectual property rights and fair compensation.


The Significance of Makate’s Victory


Beyond the financial implications, Makate's triumph represents a watershed moment in the corporate world's acknowledgment of individual contributions to innovation.

The ruling sends a resounding message to large corporations about the ethical imperative of recognizing and compensating individuals for their creative endeavours.

Makate's case has garnered widespread attention, transforming him into a symbol of inventor rights and fair treatment. His unwavering perseverance underscores the critical role of legal avenues in resolving disputes over intellectual property, ensuring that innovators receive the recognition and compensation they deserve.


The Organizational Perspective


The "Please Call Me" case has profound implications for organizations worldwide, prompting a re-evaluation of policies and practices surrounding intellectual property ownership and employee innovation. It raises crucial questions:


  • Do organizations own their employees' ideas, especially those with commercial potential?

  • How can organizations incentivize and manage employee-driven innovation?

  • What processes should organizations implement to encourage idea generation and ensure fair compensation?


Mitigating your Makate


To navigate these challenges, organizations must conduct intellectual property audits, review employment agreements, and develop clear policies on ownership and commercialization. It's essential to foster a culture of innovation that encourages bottom-up idea generation and rewards creative contributions.


By striking a balance between protecting intellectual property rights and incentivizing employee innovation, organizations can unlock a wealth of untapped potential while safeguarding against costly legal battles.


Looking Ahead


As the dust settles on Makate's victory, organizations have an opportunity to learn from this saga and fortify their approach to intellectual property management. By championing a culture of innovation and fairness, they can harness the power of employee creativity to drive sustainable growth and competitive advantage.


In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate innovation, the lessons of the "Please Call Me" case serve as a beacon of guidance, reminding organizations of the profound impact of recognizing and rewarding ingenuity.

21 views0 comments


bottom of page