top of page


Annual leave, an essential part of employment, can often be a source of confusion. Whether you're an employer or employee, understanding how annual leave works, when it's paid, and what happens when it's not taken is crucial. In this guide, we'll break down the complexities of annual leave, making it easy to understand without delving into legal jargon.

1. The Basics of annual leave

Annual leave is a topic that raises many questions. Let's begin by exploring the matter of payment for annual leave. The law that governs this is the Basic Conditions of Employment Act (BCEA), specifically section 20, which outlines the rules regarding annual leave. The key point to remember here is that employers generally can't replace paid annual leave with a cash payment. However, there is an exception to this rule.

When an employee's employment comes to an end, whether through resignation or termination, section 40 (b) & (c) of the BCEA comes into play. This section stipulates that employers must provide payment to the employee for any unused annual leave, calculated according to their current salary.

2. Understanding annual leave entitlement

Now, let's delve into annual leave entitlement. The BCEA guarantees employees 21 days of annual leave per annual leave cycle, which lasts for 12 months. Employers have a responsibility to ensure that employees take their leave during this period. The idea is to provide employees with an opportunity to rest and recharge.

But what if employees choose not to take their annual leave within this 12-month period? Or what if the employer refuses to grant the leave, or both parties ignore the annual leave period, letting it roll over from one cycle into the next? This is where things can get complicated.

3. The Dilemma of accumulating annual leave

Employers typically don't mind when employees don't take all their statutory annual leave because they benefit from their work. However, complications can arise when employees demand payment for untaken leave upon termination, especially if their salary has increased since the time the leave was earned.

Two court cases, Jooste and Jardine, offered different interpretations of the BCEA.

Jooste's stance was that annual leave should be taken and that employers could even unilaterally place employees on leave if an agreement couldn't be reached. The court concluded that, upon termination, employees are entitled to payment for annual leave from the immediately preceding annual leave cycle.

On the other hand, Jardine argued that the BCEA does not oblige employees to take their annual leave during an extended period. The employer could compel the employee to take leave, but employees weren't required to initiate the process. The court ruled that annual leave not taken in the extended period is not automatically forfeited.

4. Clarity in the Ludick Case

The confusion over these two interpretations was resolved in the Ludick v Rural Maintenance case. The court favoured Jooste's interpretation, emphasizing that employees are entitled to payment for statutory annual leave from the current and immediately prior annual leave cycle.

5. Emphasizing best practices in the workplaces

The key takeaway from these legal interpretations is the importance of sound human resource management practices in the workplace. Employers should proactively plan for employees' annual leave and, when necessary, encourage them to take leave if they're not doing so on their own.

In a world where businesses often face constant challenges, it's tempting to overlook employees working without a break, with a focus solely on output and productivity. Some employees may even be inclined to accumulate annual leave, thinking of it as a financial cushion upon termination.

However, the court's clarifications emphasize that annual leave is meant for rest and relaxation, not as a long-term savings plan.

Annual leave is a statutory right and obligation, intended to allow employees to recuperate, ensuring they can continue to contribute to the workforce effectively.

Balancing the well-being of employees with productivity is essential for a healthy and productive workplace.

423 views1 comment

1 comentario

Can an employer (in the employment contract) have a clause that makes an employee forfeit a portion of their leave at the end of the annual leave cycle? For example, at the end of the leave cycle an employee has 11 days but the contract says they will only be allowed to carry over 3 of them into the six month period where they will need to spent or lost.

Me gusta
bottom of page